When less is more: Why fewer folds make a better croissant
A pastry technique that actually saves you time.

Sometimes it feels like more is better, especially when you’re in the kitchen. More chocolate, more pizza, more salt, more recipes: all things that should have limitless bounds, if you ask me. Though in just a few special cases, less is actually more. Being less fussy and doing less work can yield a better final product. This is the story of a surprising (and notoriously fussy) character: the chocolate croissant, a.k.a. pain au chocolat.
Let me introduce you to our Pain au Chocolat recipe, originally added to our website in 2009, courtesy of our research and development team. Loosely based on our Baker’s Croissants, it starts with a yeasted, slightly enriched dough that encases a beautiful butter block and sticks of rich, bittersweet chocolate.
As with most laminated dough. the butter is encased by the dough (or “locked in”), and then the dough is rolled and folded repeatedly to create lots of layers. The original recipe calls for four sets of what bakers call either a “single fold” or a “letter fold.”
What’s a letter fold, you ask? The dough is essentially folded in thirds, as if folding a piece of paper to put in a business envelope. The bottom third is folded up and covers the middle third, and then the top third is folded down, covering that same section.
This process of performing letter folds is repeated another three times in the original Pain au Chocolat recipe, with some rest periods in between. The final result is 163 layers of dough and butter!
If you’re thinking that almost 200 layers seem excessive, you might be onto something.
“Man, that’s a LOT of folds!”
This is precisely what King Arthur baking ambassador Martin Philip thought when he started playing around with the Pain au Chocolat recipe in hopes of coming up with a chocolate version.
To see if his gut instinct was right, Martin compared the four-letter-fold process to other well-known bakers and bakeries. Sure enough, bakers like former King Arthur Bakery director Jeffrey Hamelman, Roger Gural (formerly of Arcade Bakery in Tribeca), Karen Bornarth (of Hot Bread Kitchen in Brooklyn), and Bruno Albouze (of the eponymous San Diego bakery), and even Team USA at the 2016 Coupe du Monde (the World Cup of Baking) all use fewer folds (and in some cases far fewer folds) in their croissants.
Was there something these bakers were achieving that we were missing in our pastries?
Now that it was clear King Arthur’s original Pain au Chocolat recipe had far more folds, and thus more layers, than similar recipes, it was time to let the baked goods do the talking.
Martin made the recipe as written, including four letter folds (making all 163 layers).
And then he made another version, one where he aimed to create a marginally more open structure — what he described as a slightly wider “honeycomb” texture on the inside. This version had just two sets of folds instead of four: one letter fold followed by one “book fold,” or “double fold.” (In a book fold, the two short ends of a rectangle are folded toward the center until they meet in the middle. The whole packet is then folded in half down the middle as if closing a book.)
Croissant math is a little tricky since you have to account for all the places where the dough touches dough (it’s only a layer if it’s dough-butter-dough). But trust me when I say that, unbelievable as it might seem, Martin reduced the number of folds from 163 layers to a mere 25 layers.
There’s one other key change Martin made to the lamination process aside from simply reducing the number of folds. He performed the folds back to back with no chilling time between. *Gasp!*
No chilling time? Isn’t that one of the pillars of perfect pastry? Roll your dough, fold, chill, repeat. Isn’t resting the dough essential, to allow the gluten to relax?
It is to a point. If you tried to perform the original four sets of folds back to back, you would have ended your attempt in tears of frustration. It’s practically impossible to roll dough that many times all at once because the gluten would become too strong. But with just two folds, the gluten doesn’t get activated quite as readily. The dough is more forgiving and you can almost trick it into behaving if you work quickly.
Martin made this shortcut version of laminated dough but otherwise kept the formula the same. He put the packets aside to proof and continued on to make two versions of Pain au Chocolat: one with the original 163 layers and one with a mere 25.
As Martin says, the structure told the tale. According to him, the original four-letter-fold recipe had “many fine layers that compressed into one another, creating a tight structure.”
Slicing into the pastries revealed that the one with fewer folds had a gorgeous open texture that truly did look like a honeycomb, as well as more clearly defined layers.
When you get to the point where your dough has 160+ layers, the butter is pressed so incredibly thin that it doesn’t have quite enough moisture to create the steam that typically makes the dough layers separate and puff. Plus, the dough is stretched so tightly that it resists the puffing motion.
Instead of opening up into a beautiful open crumb (that “honeycomb” structure), a croissant made from such highly manipulated dough is tight and has almost a cell-like appearance on the inside — not exactly what most of us are looking for when we bite into a delicate, crispy croissant.
Could this truly be right? Could fewer folds actually produce a better final product, or in this case, a more desirable croissant? The pictures of the pastry baked as sheets don’t lie.
That’s not to say this method is the definitive process for making laminated dough — just consider some of the French pastry chefs who go through painstaking measures to create a tightly layered structure. To them, the small cellular texture is what defines success. But for others, an open honeycomb-like inside with a flaky, rough-puff-pastry-like texture is the end goal.
Bottom line: what defines one person’s quintessential croissant may not be the same for the next, and there’s room for all types of approaches — we've simply opted for an open-crumb croissant with more distinct layers. The shatteringly crispy shards that fly everywhere at first bite are like croissant confetti, and the distinct, buttery layers beg to be pulled apart one at a time. It's pastry made perfect.
Bake, rate, and review our Pain au Chocolat recipe, and let us know exactly how many folds you prefer your in your croissants, in the comments, below.
Cover photo by Liz Neily.
June 9, 2024 at 11:42pm
In reply to How was the 25 folds… by Rudy (not verified)
'at initial butter lock in you have 1 layer of dough-butter-dough' - no that is equal to three layers. The dough ids one layer, butter a second, and dough on top a third.
June 10, 2024 at 12:08pm
In reply to 'at initial butter lock in… by Cal (not verified)
Hi Cal, as Kye says, croissant math is a little tricky, and how you calculate the layers can vary. You might find this article helpful; it takes a deeper dive into the subject than we are able to do here.
April 26, 2023 at 12:15am
This is exactly the croissant texture my Parisian husband yearns for! He described it as being flaky on the outside but still moist, tender, and chewy on the inside. The bakeries here in LA all charge an exorbitant price for a pretty but dry and overall underwhelming croissant with countless little cells of butter flavored air. Less is definitely more.
Thanks for another lovely article.
January 22, 2022 at 5:26pm
I saw a 'rough puff' technique that rolls(like for cinnamon rolls) rather than folds the laminated dough. I'm not doing the math on this but if you do the roll it twice/ roll to a rectangle, you'll have plenty of layers. I might be inclined to chill in between rolling since you are saving so much time anyway. I have made laminated dough one time using the traditional techniques and it occurred to me that there must be a faster way of achieving a similar result.
January 16, 2022 at 12:10pm
I followed your recipe to the T and it was very tasty but why was there so much butter floating on the baking sheet when it came out of the oven? I have done other chocolate croissants recipes and never had butter on the cookie sheet when it came out of the oven. Note: The recipe calls to butter the cookie sheet which I did not do and used a Silpat and glad I did not butter it! Yes, the croissants were tasty but all that butter floating on the cookie sheet was a disappointment.
January 16, 2022 at 2:56pm
In reply to I followed your recipe to… by Leila Waller (not verified)
If you are seeing that much butter on your sheet pan Leila, we suspect there might be something going wrong. Leaking butter could be a result of several things including underproofing, a cold oven temperature (be sure to give you oven lots of time to preheat), poor lamination (if you butter breaks during the lamination process it can rip the dough and weaken it) and proofing at too high of a temperature. We can help you dive into each one of these scenarios and pinpoint what might have happened if you call us on our helpful and friendly Bakers Hotline! You can reach us at (855) 371-2253 (BAKE) Monday–Friday: 9am–9pm, Saturday & Sunday: 9am–5pm EST.
November 29, 2023 at 6:45am
In reply to If you are seeing that much… by mperry
Just finished a chocolate croissant from KAF in Norwich, VT. There was not enough chocolate or butter. The pictures posted for your recipe look better. more flakiness, more chocolate, less bready. Just thought i would let you know. They might need your help in Norwich. no need to respond if you dont want to... I will return to KAF and buy something different next time. sorry no photo. i ate the whole thing. must not have been too bad.
December 1, 2023 at 4:27pm
In reply to Just finished a chocolate… by jeffrey (not verified)
Hi Jeffrey, we're sorry to hear you weren't totally satisfied with the chocolate croissant you purchased at our bakery but do appreciate your feedback! We hope you come back soon and find a treat that is more to your liking.
November 3, 2021 at 1:59pm
Tried this and the layers and honeycomb was perfect! However, the croissants are coming out smaller than they did before. We keep them frozen for a couple days before proofing and baking, and I have a hunch that they just don’t hold up as well in the freezer. Do you have any theories/solutions for this? Thank you!
November 3, 2021 at 6:51pm
In reply to Tried this and the layers… by Marissa (not verified)
Hi Marissa! While it could be that the croissants are simply not proofing as effectively on your subsequent bakes starting with frozen dough, it is also true that the freezer can damage yeast. For this reason we recommend increasing the yeast by about one quarter in order to adjust for the freezer's inhospitable environment. Happy baking!
Pagination