When less is more: Why fewer folds make a better croissant
A pastry technique that actually saves you time.

Sometimes it feels like more is better, especially when you’re in the kitchen. More chocolate, more pizza, more salt, more recipes: all things that should have limitless bounds, if you ask me. Though in just a few special cases, less is actually more. Being less fussy and doing less work can yield a better final product. This is the story of a surprising (and notoriously fussy) character: the chocolate croissant, a.k.a. pain au chocolat.
Let me introduce you to our Pain au Chocolat recipe, originally added to our website in 2009, courtesy of our research and development team. Loosely based on our Baker’s Croissants, it starts with a yeasted, slightly enriched dough that encases a beautiful butter block and sticks of rich, bittersweet chocolate.
As with most laminated dough. the butter is encased by the dough (or “locked in”), and then the dough is rolled and folded repeatedly to create lots of layers. The original recipe calls for four sets of what bakers call either a “single fold” or a “letter fold.”
What’s a letter fold, you ask? The dough is essentially folded in thirds, as if folding a piece of paper to put in a business envelope. The bottom third is folded up and covers the middle third, and then the top third is folded down, covering that same section.
This process of performing letter folds is repeated another three times in the original Pain au Chocolat recipe, with some rest periods in between. The final result is 163 layers of dough and butter!
If you’re thinking that almost 200 layers seem excessive, you might be onto something.
“Man, that’s a LOT of folds!”
This is precisely what King Arthur baking ambassador Martin Philip thought when he started playing around with the Pain au Chocolat recipe in hopes of coming up with a chocolate version.
To see if his gut instinct was right, Martin compared the four-letter-fold process to other well-known bakers and bakeries. Sure enough, bakers like former King Arthur Bakery director Jeffrey Hamelman, Roger Gural (formerly of Arcade Bakery in Tribeca), Karen Bornarth (of Hot Bread Kitchen in Brooklyn), and Bruno Albouze (of the eponymous San Diego bakery), and even Team USA at the 2016 Coupe du Monde (the World Cup of Baking) all use fewer folds (and in some cases far fewer folds) in their croissants.
Was there something these bakers were achieving that we were missing in our pastries?
Now that it was clear King Arthur’s original Pain au Chocolat recipe had far more folds, and thus more layers, than similar recipes, it was time to let the baked goods do the talking.
Martin made the recipe as written, including four letter folds (making all 163 layers).
And then he made another version, one where he aimed to create a marginally more open structure — what he described as a slightly wider “honeycomb” texture on the inside. This version had just two sets of folds instead of four: one letter fold followed by one “book fold,” or “double fold.” (In a book fold, the two short ends of a rectangle are folded toward the center until they meet in the middle. The whole packet is then folded in half down the middle as if closing a book.)
Croissant math is a little tricky since you have to account for all the places where the dough touches dough (it’s only a layer if it’s dough-butter-dough). But trust me when I say that, unbelievable as it might seem, Martin reduced the number of folds from 163 layers to a mere 25 layers.
There’s one other key change Martin made to the lamination process aside from simply reducing the number of folds. He performed the folds back to back with no chilling time between. *Gasp!*
No chilling time? Isn’t that one of the pillars of perfect pastry? Roll your dough, fold, chill, repeat. Isn’t resting the dough essential, to allow the gluten to relax?
It is to a point. If you tried to perform the original four sets of folds back to back, you would have ended your attempt in tears of frustration. It’s practically impossible to roll dough that many times all at once because the gluten would become too strong. But with just two folds, the gluten doesn’t get activated quite as readily. The dough is more forgiving and you can almost trick it into behaving if you work quickly.
Martin made this shortcut version of laminated dough but otherwise kept the formula the same. He put the packets aside to proof and continued on to make two versions of Pain au Chocolat: one with the original 163 layers and one with a mere 25.
As Martin says, the structure told the tale. According to him, the original four-letter-fold recipe had “many fine layers that compressed into one another, creating a tight structure.”
Slicing into the pastries revealed that the one with fewer folds had a gorgeous open texture that truly did look like a honeycomb, as well as more clearly defined layers.
When you get to the point where your dough has 160+ layers, the butter is pressed so incredibly thin that it doesn’t have quite enough moisture to create the steam that typically makes the dough layers separate and puff. Plus, the dough is stretched so tightly that it resists the puffing motion.
Instead of opening up into a beautiful open crumb (that “honeycomb” structure), a croissant made from such highly manipulated dough is tight and has almost a cell-like appearance on the inside — not exactly what most of us are looking for when we bite into a delicate, crispy croissant.
Could this truly be right? Could fewer folds actually produce a better final product, or in this case, a more desirable croissant? The pictures of the pastry baked as sheets don’t lie.
That’s not to say this method is the definitive process for making laminated dough — just consider some of the French pastry chefs who go through painstaking measures to create a tightly layered structure. To them, the small cellular texture is what defines success. But for others, an open honeycomb-like inside with a flaky, rough-puff-pastry-like texture is the end goal.
Bottom line: what defines one person’s quintessential croissant may not be the same for the next, and there’s room for all types of approaches — we've simply opted for an open-crumb croissant with more distinct layers. The shatteringly crispy shards that fly everywhere at first bite are like croissant confetti, and the distinct, buttery layers beg to be pulled apart one at a time. It's pastry made perfect.
Bake, rate, and review our Pain au Chocolat recipe, and let us know exactly how many folds you prefer your in your croissants, in the comments, below.
Cover photo by Liz Neily.
November 1, 2021 at 7:16pm
is there a way I can print this lesson? I am really trying to make Croissants and I am trying to keep all the important information in one place.
November 2, 2021 at 12:43pm
In reply to is there a way I can print… by ML (not verified)
Sorry for the inconvenience, ML. We do not yet have a blog-friendly printing feature on our website. However, you could certainly copy and paste into a document and print that to keep on hand. Happy Baking!
October 31, 2021 at 3:37pm
I decided to try the reduced folds approach with a quick puff pastry recipe. I made my dough but only folded it three times (3 letter folds). I refrigerated the pastry between the first and second fold and between the second and third fold. Then popped it in the fridge for a come of hours before I used it. It worked out really well. I did not get the great airy spaces in the pictures shown here, but I got much better lift with the fewer folds than I got when I folded puff pastry many more times in the past.
October 27, 2021 at 1:52pm
To take this analysis to one level deeper, I recommend considering the total number of layers in the cross section of the final pastry.
Most plain croissants have three rotations in the final make up. But if one performs a thinner final rollout and then uses four rotations, the cross section will now have 1/3 more layers. So the baker should adjust both the number of layers in the dough, the thickness of the final rollout, and the cut size of the final pastry (which determines the number of rotations) to achieve their desired product.
For example, most chocolate croissants have fewer rotations (usually 2) than plain croissants (usually 3). So many bakers use 12 butter layers (25 total layers) for croissants, but then 16 butter layers (33 total layers) for chocolate croissants.
October 26, 2021 at 6:41pm
I wish there was a video as I'm a show me person.. I'm not sure what you mean when you say 25 layers with 2 folds.
October 28, 2021 at 5:54pm
In reply to I wish there was a video as… by Pam (not verified)
Croissant math is certainly confusing, Pam! When we are counting one layer, we are referring to dough-butter-dough. During the production process of the croissant dough, it is folded onto itself a series of times which multiplies the number of layers inside exponentially. Much like when you fold a piece of paper in half several times, you have more layers than just the number of times the paper is folded since the folding compounds on itself each time. So folding a piece of paper in half 4 times then unfolding it will give you 16 equally sized quadrants (layers). It's exponential!
October 24, 2021 at 3:00pm
Is there an updated recipe?
October 24, 2021 at 3:17pm
In reply to Is there an updated recipe? by Lisa (not verified)
Hi Lisa! We have updated our pain au chocolat recipe to exemplify this blog post which will include just the simple letter fold and book fold. Enjoy!
October 20, 2021 at 10:34pm
I just had a burning math question--- why is it 25 layers? 3x2x4 -- I got 24 layers. Is my croissant math wrong?
October 23, 2021 at 9:39am
In reply to I just had a burning math… by Megan (not verified)
Hi Megan, croissant math is indeed confusing and we're scratching our heads a bit as well, but guessing this has something to with Kye's statement that, "Croissant math is a little tricky since you have to account for all the places where the dough touches dough (it’s only a layer if it’s dough-butter-dough)." We do trust Kye and Martin when it comes to the math, and hope a few layers here or there won't interfere with the overall message here, which is that less layers can actually result in a better result.
Pagination